- Related Content
- Anti-terror law: there is no freedom without security | EPP Group in the European Parliament
- Anti-terror law: there is no freedom without security
- Counter-terror bill is a threat to press freedom, say campaigners
Bush guided the Patriot Act through Congress, unilaterally expanded surveillance of Americans, amplified executive detention authority and took other dramatic measures that shifted the balance between liberty and government power significantly, in the name of national security.
After the initial Patriot Act was passed, many Democrats perceived the growing threat to civil liberties and started to have misgivings. Now, five years into the Obama presidency enthusiasm for these measures seems to be bipartisan. As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama in and argued that sacrificing liberties in the name of anti-terrorism posed long-term risks.
He vowed that if elected he would run an administration of unprecedented transparency and vigorously protect whistleblowers. Indeed, he has raised the stakes. He promised to close Guantanamo by January , but instead slowed down releases from Guantanamo and vastly expanded the prison camp at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan.
In , he signed the renewal of the Patriot Act. He has increased the role of unmanned drones and claims the authority to order a strike against any suspected terrorist: no trial necessary.see url
Anti-terror law: there is no freedom without security | EPP Group in the European Parliament
He also has expanded the surveillance operations of the National Security Agency NSA , monitoring phone and internet traffic in a seemingly indiscriminate manner. The agency spies not just on Americans, but on residents of U.
Germany, where President Obama has enjoyed high popularity, has protested particularly loudly, knowing well the dangers of totalitarian surveillance powers. The administration also has spied on reporters, and Attorney General Eric Holder signed an arrest warrant for Fox News correspondent James Rosen over normal journalistic behavior.
Instead of affording him whistleblower protections, the administration now wants to imprison him. In fact, the current administration has used the Espionage Act against whistleblowers more than all previous administrations combined. And to prevent future whistle-blowing, the White House is encouraging federal employees to spy on one another. Our Democratic law professor president, a self-described progressive, has created a perfect storm.
Anti-terror law: there is no freedom without security
The […]. I agree to receive the Index on Censorship weekly newsletter, monthly events newsletter and periodic campaign updates via email.
- Related Content.
- Europe’s terror convicts gain freedom to improvised response.
- The Secrets of the Sea Chest, (Fribble Mouse Library Mysteries Book 4).
- UK counter-terrorism law would restrict freedom of expression - EDRi.
- More Like This;
Freedom of expression campaigners, human rights groups and legal experts are raising concerns that proposed new counter-terrorism legislation in the United Kingdom would restrict freedom of expression and limit access to information online. State security v freedom of the press: Protecting sources does not mean journalists are pro-terrorism.
Counter-terror bill is a threat to press freedom, say campaigners
Read more. House of Lords must ensure Prevent is subject to independent review. Annual review of listed terrorist organisations would be a step in the right direction for counter-terror bill. Load more.